# AI SEO Audit Proposal: Sell Evidence, Not Rankings

A client buying an SEO audit needs to know which questions you will answer and what evidence they will receive. Use AI to shape a proposal around a bounded site review, Search Console access if authorized, and a prioritized report. Keep repair work and ongoing content production separately priced and approved.

## Your brief

1. Define the domain, languages, approximate public-page count and the part of the site to inspect. Supply only crawl exports or analytics you are authorized to share.

   ____________________

2. List available evidence: URL responses, rendered and raw metadata, sitemap entries, internal links and Search Console reports. Mark unavailable data rather than filling gaps with guesses.

   ____________________

3. Agree deliverables, sample depth, issue severity and a readout meeting. State whether the work includes fixes, rechecking a deployment or only recommendations.

   ____________________

## Prompt

Draft an SEO audit service proposal for [domain and scope] using only [available evidence]. Include technical checks, content review, prioritized findings, evidence fields and a handoff meeting. Separate observed problems from hypotheses. Define access requests, exclusions and implementation options. Do not invent keyword volumes, traffic forecasts or guaranteed rankings. Add an example finding with URL, evidence, impact, suggested fix and verification method.

## Illustrative example

Illustrative finding format: ‘A supplied crawl shows three product URLs returning 404. Confirm each response, identify internal links pointing there and agree whether the pages should return, redirect or be removed from navigation.’ The proposal commits to documenting that evidence and a repair recommendation. It does not claim that fixing three URLs will produce a particular number of clicks.

## Acceptance checks

- [ ] Does every promised audit section name the evidence needed and what happens if access is unavailable?
- [ ] Are implementation, publication and post-deployment verification clearly included or excluded?
- [ ] Does the proposal avoid invented search volume, competitor data and guaranteed ranking or revenue outcomes?

Do not turn a third-party health score into proof that a site cannot rank. Explain the actual affected URLs and user impact. Likewise, a submitted sitemap is not evidence that Google indexed, ranked or sent traffic to the pages.

---

Brainbaby · https://brainbaby.ai/blog/ai-seo-audit-service-proposal

CC BY 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/